News from the IPL
INTRODUCTION
This newsletter is published by The Innovation Policy Lab at the Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto, and sponsored by the Ministry of Research and Innovation. The views and ideas expressed in this newsletter do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Ontario Government.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
New Website for the Economic Development Community: EconomicDevelopment.org
This website is edicated to helping economic developers, community leaders and business owners navigate the changing economy by providing the latest economic development information and ideas. EconomicDevelopment.org is a community resource, bringing together news from around the world, blogs, industry reports and research, professional resources and more.
IBM Injects $90 Million into Canadian Data Centre
IBM, together with the Governments of Canada and Ontario and the City of Barrie, recently unveiled what is being hailed as one of the nation’s most advanced computing facilities, the new IBM Canada Leadership Data Centre. The data centre represents a $90 million investment from IBM and will establish 20 skilled jobs in Barrie, as a portion of the $175 million IBM invested and 145 jobs created through the April 2012 launch of the IBM Canada Research and Development Centre network. In time, the new data centre is expected to provide key infrastructure and personnel to help underpin ongoing research and development initiatives tied to this network. The IBM funding is supported through the Government of Ontario’s previous $15 million investment towards these initiatives.
Editor's Pick
The State of Science and Technology in Canada, 2012
Council of Canadian Academies
This authoritative, evidence-based assessment of the state of science and technology in Canada has found that Canadian science and technology is healthy and growing in both output and impact. Over the past five years, real improvements have occurred in the magnitude and quality of Canadian science and technology. This report provides a thorough analysis of the scientific disciplines and technological applications where Canada excels in a global context. In 2010, Industry Canada via the Minister of Industry, asked the Council of Canadian Academies to assess the state of science and technology in Canada and to consider all fields in which research is conducted As such, the Council assembled an 18-member expert panel from Canada and around the world to conduct this in-depth assessment. In particular, the panel focused on research performed in the higher education sector, as well as in the not-for-profit and government sectors.
Innovation Policy
Tariq Fancy, C.D. Howe Institute
As Canadian policymakers wrestle with chronically weak Canadian productivity growth, attention has turned to the role that the venture capital (VC) ecosystem plays in fostering innovation. The 2012 Federal budget reflected this focus by earmarking $400 million to support a market for the kind of early-stage risk capital that venture capital funds provide, and without which entrepreneurial start-ups often have limited or no access to capital. This study examines which types of VC best serve the goal of promoting innovation. Focusing on the Canadian context, this study examines the relationship between VC funds and innovation, as measured by patent applications, for the years 1996 to 2008. The analysis includes foreign and domestic VC funds active in the four Canadian provinces with significant VC markets.
The Rockerfeller Foundation, New York
The report reviews early successes, current trends, and anticipated challenges, and situates them within the broader evolution of the sector and its key actors. The report examines progress over the past four years in terms of six dimensions crucial to building the impact investing industry: unlocking capital, placing and managing capital, demand for capital, assessing impact, creating an enabling environment and building leadership. The past four years of industry building in impact investing have been dynamic, creative and, above all, productive. More impact capital has been mobilized, more organizations are actively engaged, and more deals are being completed. The report describes the tangible gains in the mobilizing of capital for impact investments by a growing number of players, the range of activity that has resulted in the creation of innovative products and platforms, and increasing activity on the demand side. In spite of this impressive progress, however, impact investing still faces a range of challenges and complexities as the field evolves. There still is much to be done, especially to build industry networks in emerging markets and to strengthen capacity on the demand side. But it is clear that the industry is shifting from a period focused on organizing itself and establishing initial infrastructure to one much more clearly focused on implementation. Indeed, leaders whom we interviewed and other champions of the field more frequently speak of the need to move into an “era of execution.”
Open Science and Open Innovation: Sourcing Knowledge from Universities
Markus Perkmann and Joel West
This paper investigates how firms work with universities in the course of their innovation activities. It provides an overview of three main modes of direct interaction between firms and universities: IP licensing, research services and research partnerships. It outlines the main characteristics of each mode, its relative importance for firms as well as benefits and challenges. While licensing remains an important mode in which public research finds its way into firms¹ laboratories, the authors highlight the significant role of relationship-based modes of interaction research services and research partnerships between firms and universities. While some of these relationship-based interactions enable appropriation via intellectual property rights, others are more aligned with the norms of open science and create benefits for firms by generating basic knowledge, creating skills and enabling follow-on innovation. It concluded with open questions for future research.
Ideas, Innovation, Prosperity: High-Tech Strategy 2020 for Germany
Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Germany is facing one of the greatest economic and financial policy challenges in decades. It needs to make the most of existing growth potential and open up new prospects for German industry. As it emerges from the economic and financial crisis, the global race for knowledge is accelerating. The international competition for talent, technologies and market leadership will continue to intensify. The High-Tech Strategy is the first broad national concept in which the key stakeholders involved in innovation share a joint vision. It has formulated goals for a wide range of different fields of innovation, defined priorities, and introduced new instruments such as the leading-edge cluster competition and the innovation alliances.
Stephen Ezell and Robert D. Atkinson, ITIF
By definition, countries that wish to successfully compete in the global economy must have highly competitive traded sectors. A nation’s traded sector comprises those industries and establishments which compete in international marketplaces and whose output is sold at least in part to nonresidents of the nation. Traded sectors include almost all of a nation’s manufacturing activity, some services (such as software, Internet, and engineering services, and entertainment content like music, movies, and video games), and some of the extraction sectors (e.g., farming or mining). Because these industries face market competition that is global in nature in a way that non-traded, local-serving industries (e.g., retail trade or personal services) do not, their success is by no means assured. This report presents 50 federal-level policy recommendations to help restore U.S. traded sector competitiveness (and an additional 13 state-level recommendations). The recommendations are organized around federal policies regarding the “4Ts” of technology, tax, trade, and talent as well as policies to increase access to capital, reduce regulatory burdens, and enable better analysis of the competitiveness of U.S. traded sectors.
Restarting the Growth Engine in Finland
Henrik Braconier, OECD
Impressive productivity performance during the last decades has weakened since 2007, reflecting the 2008-09 recession but also a poor performance in important sectors, like the information and communication technology sector. Reforms to raise long term productivity growth need to be pursued. Current project-based R&D-support and business subsidies seem inefficient and should be scaled back and remaining support should focus on addressing externalities in terms of the creation of high productive jobs and R&D spillovers. A R&D tax credit could provide higher flexibility, equity and efficiency than current targeted support. Capital taxation should be streamlined to improve incentives for entrepreneurship and growth. The performance of the higher education system could be improved through allocating more R&D funding and teaching resources based on quality rather than block grants. Productivity performance could be enhanced by exposing sectors like health provision, network industries and retailing to more competition through lowering government dominance in provision and loosening planning restrictions.
Industrial Sector Strategy: UK Sector Analysis
Department for Business Innovation & Skills (BIS)
This paper analyses a range of evidence on which sectors could make the greater contribution to future economic growth and employment in the UK. It considers in which sector government action could add most value, including advanced manufacturing, knowledge intensive traded services, and enabling sectors.
Cities, Clusters & Regions
Cities and Growth: Human Capital Location Choice – Accounting for Amenities and Thick Labour Markets
W. Mark Brown and Darren M. Scott, Statistics Canada
A growing literature has found a positive association between human capital and long-run employment growth across cities. These studies have increased interest in understanding the location choices of university degree-holders, a group often used as a proxy measure of human capital. Based on data from the 2001 Canadian Census of Population, this paper investigates determinants of the location choices of degree- and non-degree-holders. With a multinomial logit model, it tests a series of hypotheses about the differential effects of thick labor markets and amenities on the location choice of these groups across metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas in Canada.
Investing in the Human Capital of Immigrants, Strengthening Regional Economies
Audrey Singer, The Brookings Institution
Coming out of the Great Recession, slow economic recovery has plagued U.S. communities. Cities and regions are seeking strategies that will grow jobs in the short term and improve standards of living over the long term. This paper examines how geographic regions can invest in the human capital and economic advancement of immigrants who are already living in their jurisdictions, to help boost short- and long-term growth. It highlights programs and partnerships that work to unlock skills of immigrants with foreign credentials and to build skills of immigrants who could advance in the market with targeted programs
Statistics & Indicators
The Ascent of America’s High-Growth Companies
The Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation
Certain regions of the country continuously produce innovative, high-growth companies that have transcended the economic downturn of the last few years. Surprisingly, those regions include more than the expected locales like Boston and Silicon Valley. The study examined geographic trends of firms included in the 1982 to 2010 Inc. 500 lists to analyze for the first time how regional characteristics are associated with high-achieving companies and innovations. A survey of Inc. 500 founders from 2000 through 2008 also provided insight into the movement of these entrepreneurs from the cities of their alma maters to the locations where they founded their companies. While Silicon Valley, Austin, Texas, and other traditional high-tech hotbeds are well-represented among the cities that house high-growth companies, the research shows that Salt Lake City, Utah; Indianapolis, Ind.; Buffalo, N.Y., and several other Rust Belt icons also have accumulated a significant cache of Inc. 500 firms. The greatest number of Inc. firms is clustered in Washington, D.C., with nearly half of these firms operating in the government services sector.
Investment Activity by Canadian Angel Groups: 2011 Report
National Angel Capital Organization (NACO)
This report, the second of its kind, examines 2011 activity levels and highlights trends such as a significant increase in levels of Angel activity. The report also presents an initial analysis of the mode of exit and the returns generated by Angel-backed companies.
Policy Digest
Redesigning State Economic Development Agencies
NGA Center for Best Practices
Policies to boost innovation, competitiveness and job creation are top priorities for the nation’s governors. State economic development agencies play a large role in making and putting in place those policies and, accordingly, how states are rebounding from the recession that ended in 2009. State leaders seeking to lay the foundation for renewed economic prosperity should try to ensure that such agencies function as effiectively and efficiently as possible, so that economic recovery brings with it strong growth and high-paying jobs.
The fact that states are now facing daunting economic challenges makes it easier to muster broad support for transforming their economic development agencies. Governors have a unique opportunity to review the economic landscape and to propose critical changes that previously would not have been feasible. Within the past two years, at least 12 states have created new entities for economic development or have consolidated existing agencies to streamline their approach to economic development.
State commerce departments were not designed for current economic realities in the U.S. where businesses and workers face rapid changes in technologies and markets as well as new competitors from around the world. Traditionally, state economic development agencies focused on attracting investments by larger firms and often competed with one another in offering incentive packages. In recent years it has been newer firms that have accounted for the majority of economic growth and new jobs. A new understanding of how young and fast-growing businesses fuel economic growth has led state economic development agencies to focus on fostering a pro-business environment rather than ad hoc deal making. This report explores the strategies that will help states face the challenges of the new economy and create effective and efficient economic development agencies.
Strategies for Creating Successful Economic Development Agencies:
– Engage and sustain private sector involvement.
Engaging local businesses through the use of public-private development boards and other cooperative endeavors can bring useful expertise and perspective to the development process. In Oregon, for example, the private sector has become a central actor in the economic development process through an independent organization called the Oregon Business Council (OBC) that is run entirely by a collective of supporting businesses.
– Create mechanisms to encourage collaboration.
Collaboration among businesses, academic institutions, and government agencies is one of the most important characteristics of effective economic development infrastructures. North Carolina spurs collaboration through a 37-member economic development board made up of representatives from government agencies, nonprofit organizations, private businesses, and the state legislature. Collaboration between states and regions is becoming increasingly important, as well. Colorado, New York, and Tennessee have all recently completed regional plans that have been rolled up into a statewide economic development plan.
– Institute a quantitative evaluation system.
Economic development agencies that use metrics for evaluation such as return on investment and job creation have the statistical information they need to target areas for focused policy and to ensure that state funds are being channeled to the most productive uses possible. Maine, Massachusetts, Mississippi, and Oregon benchmark specific indicators related to the innovation economy and the contribution of those indicators to state growth.
Redesigning State Economic Development Agencies
NGA Center for Best Practices
Policies to boost innovation, competitiveness and job creation are top priorities for the nation’s governors. State economic development agencies play a large role in making and putting in place those policies and, accordingly, how states are rebounding from the recession that ended in 2009. State leaders seeking to lay the foundation for renewed economic prosperity should try to ensure that such agencies function as effiectively and efficiently as possible, so that economic recovery brings with it strong growth and high-paying jobs.
The fact that states are now facing daunting economic challenges makes it easier to muster broad support for transforming their economic development agencies. Governors have a unique opportunity to review the economic landscape and to propose critical changes that previously would not have been feasible. Within the past two years, at least 12 states have created new entities for economic development or have consolidated existing agencies to streamline their approach to economic development.
State commerce departments were not designed for current economic realities in the U.S. where businesses and workers face rapid changes in technologies and markets as well as new competitors from around the world. Traditionally, state economic development agencies focused on attracting investments by larger firms and often competed with one another in offering incentive packages. In recent years it has been newer firms that have accounted for the majority of economic growth and new jobs. A new understanding of how young and fast-growing businesses fuel economic growth has led state economic development agencies to focus on fostering a pro-business environment rather than ad hoc deal making. This report explores the strategies that will help states face the challenges of the new economy and create effective and efficient economic development agencies.
Strategies for Creating Successful Economic Development Agencies:
– Engage and sustain private sector involvement.
Engaging local businesses through the use of public-private development boards and other cooperative endeavors can bring useful expertise and perspective to the development process. In Oregon, for example, the private sector has become a central actor in the economic development process through an independent organization called the Oregon Business Council (OBC) that is run entirely by a collective of supporting businesses.
– Create mechanisms to encourage collaboration.
Collaboration among businesses, academic institutions, and government agencies is one of the most important characteristics of effective economic development infrastructures. North Carolina spurs collaboration through a 37-member economic development board made up of representatives from government agencies, nonprofit organizations, private businesses, and the state legislature. Collaboration between states and regions is becoming increasingly important, as well. Colorado, New York, and Tennessee have all recently completed regional plans that have been rolled up into a statewide economic development plan.
– Institute a quantitative evaluation system.
Economic development agencies that use metrics for evaluation such as return on investment and job creation have the statistical information they need to target areas for focused policy and to ensure that state funds are being channeled to the most productive uses possible. Maine, Massachusetts, Mississippi, and Oregon benchmark specific indicators related to the innovation economy and the contribution of those indicators to state growth.
Events
Porto, Portugal, 11-13 October, 2012
The Regional Innovation Policies seminars place the emphasis on regions, acknowledging its relevant role for constructing sustainable competitive advantages. Previous seminars held at Porto (University of Porto), Salzburg (University of Salzburg), Santander (University of Cantabria), Edinburgh (Napier Edinburgh University), Grimstad (University of Agder, Norway) and Lund (Lund University – CIRCLE, Sweden) have contributed to the discussion on the role of regional policies to promote innovation and economic development. The 7th edition returns to Porto and will be hosted by INESC Technology and Science – INESC TEC – a Portuguese Associate Laboratory coordinated by INESC Porto and internationally recognized for its commitment to science and technology advance. The conference is directed toward researchers, policy makers, and practitioners interested in issues related to regional innovation policy, regional competitiveness and regional development. Although participants are encouraged to present their work in open or organized sessions, it is also possible to attend without presenting a paper.
Venture Capital and the U.S. National Innovation System
Toronto, 18 October, 2012
This seminar in the Innovation Policy Lab Seminar Series at the Munk School of Global Affairs (University of Toronto) features Professor Martin Kenney from UC Davis (Dept. Human and Community Development) speaking about venture capital in the United States.
The Governance of a Complex World
Nice, France, 1-3 November, 2012
In a period of crisis – according to many commentators the most important one since the Great Depression – the governance of an ever increasingly complex world is a major challenge to economics and social sciences, especially in the current stage where no clear consensus has emerged so far in our scientific communities. The aim of the 2012 International Conference on “The Governance of a Complex World” is the identification of major propositions of political economy for a new society, grounded on structural, technological and institutional change. We encourage submissions dealing with different levels of governance (countries, industries, firms, individuals), where innovation is viewed as a key driver to stir our complex world out of the crisis. We especially welcome analyses in the field of knowledge dynamics, industrial evolution and economic development, dealing with key issues of the emergence and persistence of innovation, entrepreneurship, growth of firms, corporate governance and performance, agglomeration/dispersion of industrial activities, skills dynamics, economics of science and innovation, environment as a driver of innovation.
Triple Helix Workshop: Building the Entrepreneurial University
Stanford, CA, 12-16 November, 2012
T he Triple Helix Research Group at Stanford University’s Human Sciences and Technologies Advanced Research Institute (H-STAR) announces a new initiative for 2012: the Triple Helix Workshop Series that starts with the five-day intensive workshop “Building the Entrepreneurial University”. The event is organized to meet a growing demand for learning about the university’s “third mission”, next to education in research – the involvement in economic development and growth creation at regional and national level. The workshop presents the experience of some of the most successful US entrepreneurial universities, including Stanford, MIT, Utah, Arizona State, Berkeley, CalTech, Boston, University of Southern California. We are also discussing various innovation initiatives at the university-industry-government interface, US federal and state policies and mechanisms to support them, the successful trajectory of some high-tech companies emerging from university research, and the role of venture capital and business angel investments in this effort.
London, UK, 23 November, 2012
One of the major impacts of the current economic crisis is the way it is deepening territorial inequalities at a time when the scope for public intervention to tackle inequality is being diminished as a result of widespread austerity measures. These developments pose many challenges for the analysis and management of territorial development strategies, particularly at the scale of cities and regions. Some of the many challenges centre on which regions and industries will suffer and which will show greater capacity to adapt and thrive in an uncertain political and economic environment. How will extant (and classic) forms of urban and regional development policy be affected? Will the current crises expose the failures of these policies or demonstrate their strengths? What alternative models of territorial development are there? Should any of these alternative models be considered, that is, are they likely to redress some of the structural inequalities reinforced in the current context? To address these issues future research is needed interpreting regional inequality trends, combined with an analysis of their impact in particular places. This should take into account both macro-processes and local dynamics as this will be crucial in deepening our understandings of how an international financial crisis and the politics of ‘expansionary austerity’ affect the prospects of cities and regions. We also need to evaluate the opportunities and challenges ahead, reflect on the usefulness of previous approaches, and explore the potential of alternative territorial development strategies. In vogue concepts such as ‘city regions’ and ‘creative places’ need to be re-evaluated while emerging notions of ‘shrinking cities’ and ‘smart specialization’ must be carefully evaluated. Equally, the notion of managing decline, both economic and environmental, is likely to become more relevant as opportunities for significant public investment are reduced.
Madrid, Spain, 10-12 April, 2013
The Conference aims to encourage dialogue betweens academics and practitioners to improve innovation policy design, implementation and evaluation. The conference will offer keynote speeches, parallel thematic sessions, roundtable discussions, special activities for young researchers and ample space for all participants to interact. Visits to research and innovation centres both in public and private institutions will be offered after the conference.
Subscriptions & Comments
Please forward this newsletter to anyone you think will find it of value. We look forward to collaborating with you on this initiative. If you would like to comment on, or contribute to, the content, subscribe or unsubscribe, please contact us at ipl.munkschool@utoronto.ca.
This newsletter is prepared by Jen Nelles.
Project manager is David A. Wolfe.